What grading is
Grading is the process of evaluating each player’s skills, physical abilities, netball knowledge and game mentality before the season begins. The goal is to place every player into a team and division (A / B / C grades) where they’re evenly matched with their peers and have the best chance to keep developing their game.
During trials, players rotate through positions while independent selectors score them against a shared rubric. No single person decides a placement — selectors’ scores are pooled with previous coaches’ reports and trial data, and the grading committee reviews the whole picture before teams are confirmed.
What is scored
Seaforth Netball uses the Manly Warringah Netball Association (MWNA) competency framework. On grading day, each grader scores every player across six core competencies on a 1–5 scale. The rubric is identical for every grade and every age group, which keeps comparison consistent within and across pools.
- Footwork
- Balance, change of direction, agility, landing technique.
- Ball handling
- Catching, releasing, ball-security under pressure.
- Attacking play
- Passing accuracy, spacing, leads, decision-making.
- Defensive skills
- Defensive pressure, intercepts, recovery, body positioning.
- Game sense
- Court awareness, anticipation, rule adherence, structure.
- Attitude
- Coachability, intensity, sportsmanship, teamwork.
Rating scale
- 1 · Developing
- 2 · Emerging
- 3 · Consistent
- 4 · Strong
- 5 · Exceptional
In addition to the on-the-day rubric, each player’s coach submits a season-long competency report ahead of grading. The coach’s report extends the six grading-day competencies with two further measures — passing / decision-making and positional suitability — capturing context that a short trial may not fully reveal.
What happens on grading day
- 1
Check in
Players sign in at the check-in desk and pick up a sticker code for the day (e.g. C055). Graders only ever see the code, never the player’s name — that keeps scoring bias-free and lets players be judged on what they do on the court rather than who they are.
- 2
Mini-games
Players are allocated to courts with peers around their level. Short games rotate opponents and positions so a wide group of graders sees every player in different match-ups — not just from one angle.
- 3
Independent scoring
Each grader scores on their phone against the same rubric — footwork, ball handling, attacking play, defensive skills, game sense, attitude. The player’s coach has already submitted a pre-grading report which appears as context next to the live scoring screen. Any large disagreement between the coach’s view and the day’s scores is flagged so the grading committee can take a closer look.
- 4
Final placement
The convenor’s live dashboard tracks scoring progress throughout the day. At the end, every grader’s scores are pooled with last season’s data and coaches’ reports, and the grading committee reviews the full picture before teams are confirmed. You’ll get an email when your team is set.
Pathways
Junior (A / B / C grades)
Top of grade plays up the next season where space allows. A child who’s developing fast won’t be held back by their current grade.
Cadet & Senior
Open age — graded by club and association standards.
Modified divisions
Years 1–3 (NetSetGo). Emphasis on fun, foundational skills, and position rotation rather than competitive grading.
Who runs grading
Netball Australia sets the broad coaching and skills development frameworks the sport uses across the country (most notably the Netball Skills Development Framework). Grading itself is decentralised — it’s organised and run by your local netball club.
At Seaforth Netball Clubthat means a selectors’ panel of experienced coaches and umpires, supported by the club’s grading committee. The committee consolidates selector feedback, previous coaches’ reports, and trial data before finalising team rosters.
Continuous improvement
Seaforth Netball is committed to evolving the grading process each season. The current programme incorporates the association’s competency framework, multi-grader independent scoring, season-long coach reports, per-position analysis, and direct comparison against the prior season’s placements.
This data-driven approach is designed to reduce subjective variance and ensure player placements remain consistent, transparent, and developmentally appropriate. The grading committee reviews the methodology annually and refines the rubric, scoring weights, and review process based on outcomes from the previous season.